Strategic benefits and drawbacks of SharePoint

In my last post ‘SharePoint governance strategy in action’ I covered how the strategy for SharePoint governance has to be very different to other publishing or collaborative tools.

You need to be clear why your organisation is using SharePoint and the benefits expected.  That will shape how tight or loose your governance needs to be.

Once you are clear on this, you then need to consider the strategic benefits and drawbacks for:

  • Restricting use
  • Encouraging best practice
  • Preventing problems

I will start with the benefits and drawbacks of restricting use of key SharePoint features such as SharePoint Designer and site administration rights.

Benefits

  1. You control what is being used.
  2. You decide who uses a feature e.g. SharePoint Designer.
  3. You manage the level of autonomy each site owner has.
  4. You find out why someone needs to use a feature.
  5. You monitor costs for licences, users, servers, etc.
  6. You measure who is using what and why for reporting.

Drawbacks

  1. You stifle innovation by not allowing people to test out ideas.
  2. You stop legitimate use by asking for permission to use features.
  3. You prevent people being able to share knowledge how they wish to.
  4. You may be unable to realise the maximum potential of SharePoint.
  5. You create unnecessary administration.
  6. You risk adding costs without any value to offset them with.

So you need to get the balance right with governance that gives you maximum value for the effort needed managing SharePoint.

I’d really like to hear about firsthand experiences dealing with these points/decisions and what tradeoffs you had to make.  More about how to encourage best practice in my next post.

11 responses to “Strategic benefits and drawbacks of SharePoint

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention Strategic benefits and drawbacks of SharePoint 2010 « Mark Morrell -- Topsy.com

  2. Hi Mark

    Thanks for this lucid summation of a debate many organisatios are having at the moment. Highlighting the costs and admin burden associated with control is particularly helpful.

    Regards, Jo Ann

  3. Pingback: How to encourage SharePoint 2010 best practice « Mark Morrell

  4. Pingback: A SharePoint 2010 strategy to prevent problems « Mark Morrell

  5. Pingback: Aligning your SharePoint 2010 strategy with your business strategy « Mark Morrell

  6. Pingback: Moving to SharePoint 2010? Define your stakeholder strategy « Mark Morrell

  7. Pingback: SharePoint 2010 special interest group « Mark Morrell

  8. Pingback: BT Intranet SharePoint 2010 examples « Mark Morrell

  9. Pingback: Measuring the value SharePoint 2010 can bring to your organisation « Mark Morrell

  10. Pingback: It’s how you use SharePoint 2010 that decides the value it brings « Mark Morrell

  11. Pingback: SharePoint 2010: the human dimension « Mark Morrell

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s